* John Snow (js...@redhat.com) wrote: <snip>
> I'd rather do something like this: > - Always flush bitmaps to disk on inactivate. Does that increase the time taken by the inactivate measurably? If it's small relative to everything else that's fine; it's just I always worry a little since I think this happens after we've stopped the CPU on the source, so is part of the 'downtime'. Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
