On 3 August 2018 at 10:21, Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@linaro.org> wrote: > The 'sbsa' machine won't consume QEMU generated ACPI, so it won't > touch or add new ACPI tables. > > UEFI relies on its ACPI to load OS, but currently it still needs DT > from QEMU to pass some info, one example is CPU number. > > So, the 'sbsa' code implementation should be like this: > A separate file, no ACPI codes, a little necessary DT codes. > > "Necessary DT codes" doesn't include so many peripheral devices nodes, > so the code overlap with virt won't be so much (contrary to sbsa.c > with all the DT codes), then no need to separate the common part to a > third file, and virt.c can be untouched or only a minor change with > few lines.
Would the real hardware you are trying to be an example for use DT for this? It seems a bit unlikely to me. thanks -- PMM
