* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Currently the vmstate subsection handling code treats a subsection
> > with no 'needed' function pointer as if it were the subsection
> > list terminator, so the subsection is never transferred and nor
> > is any subsection following it in the list.
> >
> > Handle NULL 'needed' function pointers in subsections in the same
> > way that we do for top level VMStateDescription structures:
> > treat the subsection as always being needed.
> >
> > This doesn't change behaviour for the current set of devices
> > in the tree, because all subsections declare a 'needed' function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > NB: last para in the commit message is only true once the
> > "Arm migration fixes for 3.0" patchset has been committed.
> > We could optionally drop some of the "use a dummy needed fn"
> > changes once this is in...
> >
> > I thought I'd sent this out a few days back, but apparently not,
> > since it's not on-list...
> >
> > migration/vmstate.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/vmstate.c b/migration/vmstate.c
> > index 6b9079bb51e..0bc240a3175 100644
> > --- a/migration/vmstate.c
> > +++ b/migration/vmstate.c
> > @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int vmstate_save_state_v(QEMUFile *f, const
> > VMStateDescription *vmsd,
> > static const VMStateDescription *
> > vmstate_get_subsection(const VMStateDescription **sub, char *idstr)
> > {
> > - while (sub && *sub && (*sub)->needed) {
> > + while (sub && *sub) {
> > if (strcmp(idstr, (*sub)->name) == 0) {
> > return *sub;
> > }
>
> Ack to this one. Code supposed that needed was alwasy !=0. We don't
> really care on the reception side. Good spotted.
>
> > @@ -486,8 +486,8 @@ static int vmstate_subsection_save(QEMUFile *f, const
> > VMStateDescription *vmsd,
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > trace_vmstate_subsection_save_top(vmsd->name);
> > - while (sub && *sub && (*sub)->needed) {
> > - if ((*sub)->needed(opaque)) {
> > + while (sub && *sub) {
> > + if (vmstate_save_needed(*sub, opaque)) {
> > const VMStateDescription *vmsdsub = *sub;
> > uint8_t len;
>
>
> I am not so sure about this one. Why are we having a subsection without
> a ->needed function? I don't know why that it is useful for. if we
> don't have a needed function, then it is just better to just add that
> "subsection" to the normal section, increase the version number and live
> with that, no?
I think people are probably preferring adding a subsection comparing to
using the _V macros everywhere. It's also a lot more robust.
Dave
> Later, Juan.
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
