Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 August 2018 at 15:40, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >> But having 3 subsections with the same needed function ... we could have >> a single subsection. > > I wanted to keep the change small here since we're very > late in the release cycle, so I kept it to a change > that restores the intent of the code, ie "always transfer > the subsection".
ok with minimizing changes. But I can't understand why that is going that way. Seeing this, I am making a patch that at registration time check that we are not doing something stupid, like not having needed function, bad names, whatever. Thanks.
