On 08/16/2018 07:57 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> + switch (opc) {
> + case NM_POOL32AXF_2_0_7:
> + switch (extract32(ctx->opcode, 9, 3)) {For future cleanup, I can't help but thinking you'd be better served by extracting a different set of opcode bits and having a single switch. That said, it all appears to all be correct, so Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> r~
