On 2018-08-22 13:43, Max Reitz wrote:

[...]

> I'd like .main_loop_settle().  Or .main_loop_post_run().  I think it's
> OK to have names that aren't as cool and tense as possible, when in
> return they actually tell you what they're doing.  (Sure,
> .main_loop_post_run() sounds really stupid, but it tells you exactly
> when the function is called and what it's for.)

Looking at the next patch, I realized that .main_loop_complete() or
.complete_in_main_loop() would work just as well.  (No, I don't see any
confusion with whether you need to call job_completed(), especially
since after this series you can probably make that function static to
job.c.)

Max

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to