On 9/18/18 12:04 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Does libatomic give us a firm guarantee that for 32-bit > types it will definitely produce an inline atomic access > insn that will interwork with what we're using? At the > moment our guard against this going wrong is that we don't > link against libatomic (so we get a compile failure if the > compiler decides to do something weird and out of line).
No, it does not. r~
