Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 2011/2/23 Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>:
>> struct FdMigrationState
>> {
>> - MigrationState mig_state;
>> int64_t bandwidth_limit;
>> QEMUFile *file;
>> int fd;
>> @@ -48,7 +35,12 @@ struct FdMigrationState
>> int (*get_error)(struct FdMigrationState*);
>> int (*close)(struct FdMigrationState*);
>> int (*write)(struct FdMigrationState*, const void *, size_t);
>> + void (*cancel)(FdMigrationState *s);
>> + int (*get_status)(FdMigrationState *s);
>> + void (*release)(FdMigrationState *s);
>> void *opaque;
>> + int blk;
>> + int shared;
>> };
>
> Although I don't have objections for folding MigrationState into
> FdMigrationState, it would be good to ask why the original author
> split it intentionally.
I asked, Anthony answer was that it is a "historical" artifact.
Later, Juan.
