On 26 October 2018 at 14:26, Singh, Brijesh <brijesh.si...@amd.com> wrote: > > > On 10/25/2018 07:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:16:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> These should presumably all be "ULL". (The "UL" suffix is >>> usually a bug, as it's either unnecessary or should be ULL.) >> >> Yea. Fixed. Brijesh could you start cleaning up that header generally? >> It has all kind of weird code like using bitfields for hardware >> accesses. That isn't portable - switch to full dword fields with shift >> and | to operate them and proper cpu_to_le APIs or similar please. >> > > > Noted, I will look into cleaning up this and send patches for reviews.
Thanks. You might like to look at the extract32()/extract64()/ deposit32()/deposit64() functions in bitops.h, which are often (but not always) cleaner than hand-rolled shifts-and-logical-ops for assembling and disassembling fields. thanks -- PMM
