On 03/02/2011 11:30 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
It's really the natural generalization
of what you're proposing.
So basically, the only differences are:
1) always use the new RAID1 format
2) drop the progress bitmap
3) support multiple devices per file
4) let drive properties be specified beyond filename
All reasonable things to do.
Well, I dislike 3, and the whole "qemu is authoritative source of
configuration" thing.
Yeah, at this point, I think the new no-stored-state approach is
obviously better than anything proposed. So we'll have to revisit this
discussion if/when there's another use-case that demands it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
