On 2018-11-08 10:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/11/2018 20:30, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 2018-11-07 20:24, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> On 07/11/2018 16:41, Samuel Ortiz wrote: >>>>> - The Kconfig parser would be used to generate the equivalent of what we >>>>> currently have under default-configs/ >> >> I think we would still have something like default-configs - but there >> would only be the bare minimum config switches in there, the rest would >> be pulled in by dependencies. > > Yes, in theory default-configs would end up empty, except for possibly > some commented lines to show the "default y" symbols for the target.
I think we should enable the machines in the default configs (and maybe optional devices that are not automatically selected by machines), e.g.: CONFIG_I440FX=y CONFIG_Q35=y CONFIG_VIRTPC=y CONFIG_ISAPC=y CONFIG_VIRTIO=y CONFIG_PARALLEL=y In configs/nemu (or configs/lean-kvm or however we'll call it), you will then only have: CONFIG_Q35=y CONFIG_VIRTPC=y CONFIG_VIRTIO=y Would that make sense? Thomas
