03.12.2018 13:14, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> Current write_zeroes implementation is good enough to satisfy this flag too
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefe...@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> block/file-posix.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
> index 07bbdab953..b0b7ab0159 100644
> --- a/block/file-posix.c
> +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> *options,
> } else {
> s->discard_zeroes = true;
> s->has_fallocate = true;
> + bs->supported_zero_flags = BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE;
> }
> } else {
> if (!(S_ISCHR(st.st_mode) || S_ISBLK(st.st_mode))) {
> @@ -646,10 +647,11 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> *options,
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFS
> if (platform_test_xfs_fd(s->fd)) {
> s->is_xfs = true;
> + bs->supported_zero_flags = BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE;
why we should handle xfs separately? is there a case with xfs, not handled by
previous generic if ()?
> }
> #endif
>
> - bs->supported_zero_flags = BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP;
> + bs->supported_zero_flags |= BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP;
> ret = 0;
> fail:
> if (filename && (bdrv_flags & BDRV_O_TEMPORARY)) {
> @@ -1520,6 +1522,10 @@ static ssize_t
> handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(RawPosixAIOData *aiocb)
> }
> s->has_fallocate = false;
> }
> +
> + if (!s->has_fallocate) {
> + aiocb->bs->supported_zero_flags &= ~BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE;
> + }
> #endif
>
> return -ENOTSUP;
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
