Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:17:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:
> [...]
>> > But note that we might still be able to move the existing
>> > "hyperv_*" features to feature_word_info[].feat_names.  We just
>> > need to keep the same semantics (e.g. enable
>> > HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE automatically when some features are set).
>> >
>> > Maybe we can make some of the feature properties read-only.  This
>> > way we can give them meaningful names for debugging and error
>> > messages, even if we don't want to make them configurable
>> > directly.
>> 
>> I'd suggest (if there are no objections of course) we do this separately
>> from this patch. [...]
>
> Agreed.
>

Paolo, Eduardo,

in case there are no concerns here, could you please pick this patch up?
Thanks!

-- 
Vitaly

Reply via email to