On 2019-01-09 15:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:51:33PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 2019-01-09 15:31, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] >>> We could consider also setting a suitable -std for CXXFLAGS too in future >>> though... >> >> Shall I send a v3 with "-std=gnu++98" (which seems to be the only usable >> option right now), or shall we wait until we really hit a problem with >> the C++ code? > > I'd have a slight preference for adding a C++ suitable -std now > just to give us a more predictable build setup. I think that's my preference, too. I'll send a v3...
Thomas
