On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko > <igor.v.kovale...@gmail.com> wrote: >> --- a/target-sparc/helper.c >> +++ b/target-sparc/helper.c >> @@ -572,6 +572,23 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPUState *env, >> target_phys_addr_t *physical, >> /* ??? We treat everything as a small page, then explicitly flush >> everything when an entry is evicted. */ >> *page_size = TARGET_PAGE_SIZE; >> + >> +#if defined (DEBUG_MMU) >> + /* safety net to catch wrong softmmu index use from dynamic code */ > > What does "wrong softmmu index" mean? Is it an error or an indication > that something is not implemented? > I'm hitting this net with the following message:
The warning is not correct for CPUs without hypervisor mode. On T1/T2, the default access mode when TL > 1 is hypervisor or nucleus mode. Even then, the hypervisor could perform some accesses with kernel or user ASIs.
