Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 14/03/19 13:16, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Mmm, that makes sense. So in this particular case, do we >> want to try to avoid doing an unbounded allocation based >> on whatever rubbish the user passed us in the environment, >> or do we say "this particular case is OK" and mark it >> as a false-positive ? >> >> Cc'ing Gerd since the Coverity issues in question are >> in the audio code (in get_str() and in >> audio_handle_legacy_opts()). > > I think the solution for that is deprecating the old legacy options and > getting rid of them in one year...
+1
