On Fri 15 Mar 2019 12:18:43 PM CET, Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Coverity doesn't like that the return value of bdrv_check_update_perm()
> stays unused only in this place (CID 1399710).
>
> Even if checking local_err should be equivalent to checking ret < 0,
> let's switch to using the return value to be more consistent (and in
> case of a bug somewhere down the call chain, forgetting to assign errp
> is more likely than returning 0 for an error case).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com>

Berto

Reply via email to