> From: Mateja Marjanovic <mateja.marjano...@rt-rk.com> > Subject: [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU > > From: Mateja Marjanovic <mateja.marjano...@rt-rk.com> > > Wrong type of NaN was generated for IEEE754-2008 by maddf and > msubf insturctions when the arguments were inf, zero, nan or > zero, inf, nan respectively. >
"insturctions" -> "instructions". The word "respectively" is here wrong and spurious. The meaning that you convey with the current wording is that the "inf, zero, nan" case is related to "maddf" (only), and the "zero, inf, nan" to "msubf". Please use full instruction names with possible Backus-Naur shorthands, like "MADDF.<D|S>", "MSUBF.<D|S>". Thanks, Aleksandar