On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:02:12 -0400 Farhan Ali <al...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/01/2019 04:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > When we get a solicited interrupt, the start function may have > > been cleared by a csch, but we still have a channel program > > structure allocated. Make it safe to call the cp accessors in > > any case, so we can call them unconditionally. > > > > While at it, also make sure that functions called from other parts > > of the code return gracefully if the channel program structure > > has not been initialized (even though that is a bug in the caller). > > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Farman<far...@linux.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck<coh...@redhat.com> > > --- > > Hi Connie, > > My series of fixes for vfio-ccw depends on this patch as I would like to > call cp_free unconditionally :) (I had developed my code on top of your > patches). > > Could we pick this patch up as well when/if you pick up my patch series? > I am in the process of sending out a v2. > > Regarding this patch we could merge it as a stand alone patch, separate > from this series. And also the patch LGTM > > Reviewed-by: Farhan Ali <al...@linux.ibm.com> Actually, I wanted to ask how people felt about merging this whole series for the next release :) It would be one thing less on my plate...
