On Tue, 14 May 2019 10:56:43 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 14.05.19 10:50, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Another idea for temporary handling: Simply only indicate 240 CPUs to > > the guest if the response does not fit into a page. Once we have that > > SCLP thingy, this will be fixed. Guest migration back and forth should > > work, as the VCPUs are fully functional (and initially always stopped), > > the guest will simply not be able to detect them via SCLP when booting > > up, and therefore not use them. > > Yes, that looks like a good temporary solution. In fact if the guest relies > on simply probing it could even make use of the additional CPUs. Its just > the sclp response that is limited to 240 (or make it 247?) Where did the 240 come from - extra spare room? If so, 247 would probably be all right?
