On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 18.04.2011, at 15:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Jan-Simon Möller wrote: > >> Am Montag, 18. April 2011, 14:19:26 schrieb Riku Voipio: > >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > >>>>> The patch looks OK, but I'd like to have a try with some s390x static > >>>>> binaries. Such binaries are also useful for me to test that new patches > >>>>> for linxu-user don't break targets I don't usually use. > >>>> > >>>> Sure - what exactly would you like there? I can easily compile a few. Do > >>>> you want to have them added to the tests/ directory? > >>> > >>> busybox has so far been most useful. > >>> > >> > >> Good idea, what about adding a collection of static busybox for the > >> different > >> arches? Not everyone testing has the compiler around for $ARCH . > >> > > > > It's something that already exists [1]. It would actually make sense to > > add s390x binaries there. Also it might be a good idea to provide a > > minimal system image as on other architectures. > > > > [1] http://wiki.qemu.org/Download > > I find the minimal systems rather useless, but love your Debian images. So if > you could create one of those for s390, that'd be awesome! :) >
Once I get qemu-system-s390x fully working, it looks my scripts to produce images should work with minor changes for s390. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
