On 25.06.19 16:47, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>> RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with >>> rbd_create() or rbd_resize(). >>> In order to support growing images (eg. qcow2), we resize the >>> image before write operations that exceed the current size. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> v3: >>> - add 'image_size' field in the BDRVRBDState to keep track of the >>> current size of the RBD image [Jason, Kevin] >>> --- >>> block/rbd.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c >>> index 0c549c9935..b0355a2ce0 100644 >>> --- a/block/rbd.c >>> +++ b/block/rbd.c >> >> [...] >> >>> @@ -833,6 +842,22 @@ static void qemu_rbd_close(BlockDriverState *bs) >>> rados_shutdown(s->cluster); >>> } >>> >>> +/* Resize the RBD image and update the 'image_size' with the current size >>> */ >>> +static int qemu_rbd_resize(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t size) >>> +{ >>> + BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque; >>> + int r; >>> + >>> + r = rbd_resize(s->image, size); >>> + if (r < 0) { >>> + return r; >>> + } >>> + >>> + s->image_size = size; >> >> I think this should update bs->total_sectors, too. In fact, I’m >> wondering why you don’t just use bs->total_sectors (or bdrv_getlength(), >> which returns bs->total_sectors * 512) instead of adding this new field? >> > > Hi Max, > thanks for taking a look! > > I used bs->total_sectors in the v2, but Jason pointed out a possible > issue with this, so I proposed to add a variable in the BDRVRBDState to > track the latest resize and Kevin acked [1]. > > IIUC what Kevin said on his comment, the 'bs->total_sectors' should be > updated by bdrv_co_write_req_finish(), for this reason I didn't update > it. > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg615195.html
Ah, right! Yeah, sure, now that I think about it, the block layer must have general code for successful writes beyond EOF... (Read: Now that I’m pointed towards it...) OK then; thanks for the patch, applied to my block branch: https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature