On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:01, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 04:56:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:06, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi. This header sync doesn't look like it was a proper > > sync made with the update-headers script against some > > upstream kernel -- at least the commit message doesn't > > say what the sync was against and the fact that it only > > changes the virtio-pmem headers looks suspicious. > > > > Can you respin with a proper header sync against upstream > > mainline, please?
> This isn't from mainline. We have a bit of a deadlock with linux merge > window opening soon. I think it's reasonable temporarily > and then before release either virtio-pmem gets there or I will > revert it and drop the header. It's definitely not ideal: until the headers are actually upstream there's no guarantee that they won't change ABI. Are the headers at least in some kvm-next or equivalent tree ? When are they expected to hit mainline? thanks -- PMM
