On Fri, 6 May 2011 20:33:24 +0200 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
> On 06.05.2011, at 19:40, Scott Wood wrote: > > > OK, it looked like it was being limited to only FSL. I missed that > > PPC_BOOKE and PPC2_BOOKE_FSL are the same "kind" of flags despite being in > > different words. Does PPC_BOOKE not refer to things that are common to all > > booke? Why do the individual implementations of booke need to be listed? > > Well, the PPC_BOOKE flag was also used for the 440 tlb modification opcodes, > which are different for 2.06. So I just introduced a new one :). We could of > course also introduce yet another flag for 440s and define specific > instructions individually, but I don't really see it buying us too much for > now. It would help reduce confusion if PPC_BOOKE really meant booke, and not 440. :-) -Scott
