On Fri, 6 May 2011 14:00:35 +0200
Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
> +static inline void booke206_flush_tlb_one(ppc_tlb_t *tlb, int num)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if ((tlb[i].tlbe.prot & PAGE_VALID) &&
> + !(tlb[i].tlbe.attr & MAS1_IPROT)) {
> + tlb[i].tlbe.prot = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
When this is called on reset, we want to ignore IPROT.
The valid check seems unnecessary.
> +void helper_booke206_tlbsx(target_ulong address_hi, target_ulong address_lo)
What is address_hi?
From gen_tlbsx_booke206() it looks like these two arguments correspond to
the two operands, so shouldn't they be added together? I only see
address_lo used.
-Scott
