On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 11:50, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > I don't think we want to expose this in the QAPI schema for the socket > address, since the correct value is really something that QEMU should > figure out based on usage context. > > Thus, I think we'll have to make it an explicit parameter to the > qio_channel_socket_listen_{sync,async} APIs, and socket_listen() > and inet_listen_saddr(), etc. Then the migration code can pass in > a sensible value based on multifd usage.
How bad would it be if we just passed SOMAXCONN for the backlog value always? thanks -- PMM