On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > 02.08.2019. 17.37, "Aleksandar Markovic" <aleksandar.marko...@rt-rk.com> је > написао/ла: > > > > From: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com> > > > > This little series improves linux_ssh_mips_malta.py, both in the sense > > of code organization and in the sense of quantity of executed tests. > > > > Hello, all. > > I am going to send a new version in few days, and I have a question for > test team: > > Currently, the outcome of the script execition is either PASS:1 FAIL:0 or > PASS:0 FAIL:1. But the test actually consists of several subtests. Is there > any way that this single Python script considers these subtests as separate > tests (test cases), reporting something like PASS:12 FAIL:7? If yes, what > would be the best way to achieve that?
If you are talking about each test_*() method, they are already treated like separate tests. If you mean treating each ssh_command_output_contains() call as a separate test, this might be difficult. Cleber, is there something already available in the Avocado API that would help us report more fine-grained results inside each test case? > > Thanks in advance, > Aleksandar > > > Aleksandar Markovic (2): > > tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in > > linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > tests/acceptance: Add new test cases in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > > > tests/acceptance/linux_ssh_mips_malta.py | 81 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > -- Eduardo
