On 16 May 2011 18:29, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > That said given this patch is more or less an extension of an existing > code, we may want to apply it anyway.
That is the conclusion I'm hoping to persuade you to, yes :-) -- PMM
On 16 May 2011 18:29, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > That said given this patch is more or less an extension of an existing > code, we may want to apply it anyway.
That is the conclusion I'm hoping to persuade you to, yes :-) -- PMM