On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:52:36PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 15:50 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > We can document how to behave in case of inconsistent protocol features, > > > yes. > > > > OK. > > Coming back to this, I was just looking at it. > > How/where would you like to see this done? > > There isn't really any section that lists and explains the various > protocol features, there's only a list. I could add a new section for > "Simulation" or something like that that explains it, but then most > people would probably skip that and not ever read the text about how you > shouldn't implement F_KICK_CALL_MSGS :-) > > Any thoughts? > > johannes
Each feature is documented near the description of the functionality it enables, that can work for this. I don't much like F_KICK_CALL_MSGS as not generic enough but it's not simulation as such: IN_BAND_NOTIFICATIONS? As for how to handle errors, that probably belongs near "Communication". Or maybe add a new "Error handling" section.
