* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:42:01PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Use the automatic read unlocker in migration/ram.c;
> > only for the cases where the unlock is at the end of the function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  migration/ram.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > index b2bd618a89..750d198f37 100644
> > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > @@ -181,14 +181,14 @@ int foreach_not_ignored_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, 
> > void *opaque)
> >      RAMBlock *block;
> >      int ret = 0;
> >  
> > -    rcu_read_lock();
> > +    RCU_READ_LOCK_AUTO
> 
> FWIW, I'm not a fan of macros which are used without a trailing ';'
> as I believe it can confuses editors' code indentation logic.

Added.

> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Reply via email to