On 13/09/19 01:02, Wei Yang wrote: > It shows PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL may represents more node the tree could hold.
Which is good, it means the assert can trigger. > The assert here is not harmful, while maybe we can have a better way to handle > it? I don't know... The assert just says "careful, someone treats PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL specially!". It's documentation too. Paolo
