On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is > >> >not > >> >necessary to iterate the whole list. > >> > > >> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it > >> > > >> >v2: > >> > * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David > >> > * add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as before > >> > this change > >> > > >> >Wei Yang (2): > >> > memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check > >> > memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range > >> > > >> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++- > >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > >> > >> Would someone take this patch set? > > > >yes looks good to me too. > >Eduardo? > > > > Hmm... I don't see this any where. May I ask the status?
Sorry, I hadn't seen Michael's message. Queued on machine-next. Thanks! -- Eduardo
