On 12/4/19 10:58 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> @@ -7437,13 +7437,10 @@ void define_one_arm_cp_reg_with_opaque(ARMCPU *cpu, >> mask = PL0_RW; >> break; >> case 4: >> + case 5: >> /* min_EL EL2 */ >> mask = PL2_RW; >> break; >> - case 5: >> - /* unallocated encoding, so not possible */ >> - assert(false); >> - break; > > This change is fine - I don't think we should have asserted here anyway. > But don't we generate an unallocated exception if the CPU is v8.0?
This change is only for validation of the system registers themselves. It has nothing to do with the usage of system registers from the actual guest. r~