From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>

GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
-Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:

  hw/net/imx_fec.c: In function ‘imx_eth_write’:
  hw/net/imx_fec.c:906:12: error: this statement may fall through 
[-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
    906 |         if (unlikely(single_tx_ring)) {
        |            ^
  hw/net/imx_fec.c:912:5: note: here
    912 |     case ENET_TDAR:     /* FALLTHROUGH */
        |     ^~~~
  cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Rewrite the comments in the correct place,  using 'fall through'
which is recognized by GCC and static analyzers.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191218192526.13845-5-phi...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
 hw/net/imx_fec.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/imx_fec.c b/hw/net/imx_fec.c
index bd99236..c01ce4f 100644
--- a/hw/net/imx_fec.c
+++ b/hw/net/imx_fec.c
@@ -909,7 +909,8 @@ static void imx_eth_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, 
uint64_t value,
                           TYPE_IMX_FEC, __func__);
             return;
         }
-    case ENET_TDAR:     /* FALLTHROUGH */
+        /* fall through */
+    case ENET_TDAR:
         if (s->regs[ENET_ECR] & ENET_ECR_ETHEREN) {
             s->regs[index] = ENET_TDAR_TDAR;
             imx_eth_do_tx(s, index);
-- 
1.8.3.1



Reply via email to