On 24/01/2020 00.22, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I believe that the separate allocation of DisasFields from DisasContext
> was meant to limit the places from which we could access fields.  But
> that plan did not go unchanged, and since DisasContext contains a pointer
> to fields, the substructure is accessible everywhere.
> 
> By allocating the substructure with DisasContext, we improve the locality
> of the accesses by avoiding one level of pointer chasing.  In addition,
> we avoid a dangling pointer to stack allocated memory, diagnosed by static
> checkers.
> 
> Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661815
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/s390x/translate.c        | 22 +++++++++---------
>  target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to