"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> It will be used later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
>>
>> +int migrate_multifd_method(void)
>> +{
>> + MigrationState *s;
>> +
>> + s = migrate_get_current();
>> +
>> + return s->parameters.multifd_compress;
>> +}
>
> Shouldn't that be a MultifdCompress enum returned?
You are right here.
>>
>> #define MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC (1 << 0)
>> +#define MULTIFD_FLAG_NOCOMP (1 << 1)
>
> I don't think this should be a set of individual flags; in later patches
> you define a flag for zlib and another for zstd etc etc - but you can't
> combine them - you could never have FLAG_NOCOMP|FLAG_ZSTD|FLAG_ZLIB - so
> this should be a 3 or 4 bit field which contains a compression id (0
> being none). The ID can't exactly be the migrate_multifd_method() enum
> value - because I don't think that's defined to be stable (?).
The idea is to catch up if we got an incorrect packet with an incorrect
flag.
But yes, I agree that it could be the same expecting a value here.
The problem is that I already have the flags field.
Would it be ok for you if I reserve 3 bits for this? (right now 2
should be enough).
Thanks, Juan.
