"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> It will be used later.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
>
>> diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h
>> index d8b0205977..c7fea4914c 100644
>> --- a/migration/multifd.h
>> +++ b/migration/multifd.h
>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ int multifd_queue_page(QEMUFile *f, RAMBlock *block, 
>> ram_addr_t offset);
>>  
>>  #define MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC (1 << 0)
>>  
>> +/* We reserve 3 bits for METHODS */
>> +#define MULTIFD_FLAG_METHOD_MASK (7 << 1)
>> +#define MULTIFD_FLAG_NOCOMP (1 << 1)
>> +
>
> Doesn't the 'NOCOMP' value have to be 0 for it to not break
> compatibility with existing multifd?

You are right.  fixing on next resend.

Thanks.


Reply via email to