On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:43:34AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Supporting a build platform beyond its end of life makes no sense. > Spell that out just to be clear. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
Thanks! Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > --- > qemu-doc.texi | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qemu-doc.texi b/qemu-doc.texi > index a1ef6b6484..33b9597b1d 100644 > --- a/qemu-doc.texi > +++ b/qemu-doc.texi > @@ -2880,10 +2880,11 @@ lifetime distros will be assumed to ship similar > software versions. > > For distributions with long-lifetime releases, the project will aim to > support > the most recent major version at all times. Support for the previous major > -version will be dropped 2 years after the new major version is released. For > -the purposes of identifying supported software versions, the project will > look > -at RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu LTS, and SLES distros. Other long-lifetime distros > will > -be assumed to ship similar software versions. > +version will be dropped 2 years after the new major version is released, > +or when it reaches ``end of life''. For the purposes of identifying > +supported software versions, the project will look at RHEL, Debian, > +Ubuntu LTS, and SLES distros. Other long-lifetime distros will be > +assumed to ship similar software versions. > > @section Windows > > -- > 2.21.1 > -- Eduardo
