Hi Peter,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:01 PM Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 20:12, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> > If you're ready to send out the next version before that,
> > then leave it with the include:: directive and we can
> > fix it up to the new structure later.
>
> PS: in case you weren't aware, softfreeze for the 5.0 release
> is 17th March, so if this series is going to go in for 5.0
> then (a) people interested in reviewing it should hurry up
> and review patches 9..18 and (b) the final version would
> need to be on the list sometime this week so it can go into
> a pull request by the 17th.
>

Ah I was not aware of that date indeed! Yes, ofcourse, if we can get the
remaining parts reviewed as well to include it in 5.0, that would be great.

As a side note, I'm basically doing this project in my spare time in the
(late) evenings (Amsterdam timezone),
so I'll make sure to reserve some extra time the coming days so I can reply
and respin fast if needed.

I'm finalizing & testing the v7 update now and will send it out in a few
hours to the list.

Regards,
Niek


>
> It's no big deal if it goes into 5.1 instead I guess,
> but it feels like the series is nearly ready so I figured
> I'd set out the timeline if people want to push to get it
> into 5.0.
>

> thanks
> -- PMM
>


-- 
Niek Linnenbank

Reply via email to