Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200311132151.172389-1-fran...@linux.ibm.com/
Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [PATCH v9 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Message-id: 20200311132151.172389-1-fran...@linux.ibm.com Type: series === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. === TEST SCRIPT END === Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 Switched to a new branch 'test' 5091111 s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 3017941 docs: Add protvirt docs 8971626 s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly 80534f0 s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA 6469c9e s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation fcf17b9 s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA bc7ccf1 s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW 0dc6509 s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation 55b33fb s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD cd885bc s390x: Add SIDA memory ops 420161d s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes df0e73f s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode 1a573ba s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker f214aa5 s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility 9eb0129 Sync pv === OUTPUT BEGIN === 1/15 Checking commit 9eb01294c7d7 (Sync pv) 2/15 Checking commit f214aa5c8796 (s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility) WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #274: new file mode 100644 WARNING: line over 80 characters #600: FILE: include/hw/s390x/pv.h:48: +static inline int s390_pv_set_sec_parms(uint64_t origin, uint64_t length) { return 0; } ERROR: line over 90 characters #601: FILE: include/hw/s390x/pv.h:49: +static inline int s390_pv_unpack(uint64_t addr, uint64_t size, uint64_t tweak) { return 0; } total: 1 errors, 2 warnings, 642 lines checked Patch 2/15 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. 3/15 Checking commit 1a573ba2b449 (s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker) 4/15 Checking commit df0e73f31901 (s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode) 5/15 Checking commit 420161d14911 (s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes) ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent #48: FILE: target/s390x/kvm.c:1696: switch (icpt_code) { [...] + case ICPT_PV_INSTR: + case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION: total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 16 lines checked Patch 5/15 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. 6/15 Checking commit cd885bcb5756 (s390x: Add SIDA memory ops) 7/15 Checking commit 55b33fb822b7 (s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD) 8/15 Checking commit 0dc650979f79 (s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation) 9/15 Checking commit bc7ccf1d1d99 (s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW) 10/15 Checking commit fcf17b96e7cc (s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA) 11/15 Checking commit 6469c9e84dab (s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation) 12/15 Checking commit 80534f0309d2 (s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA) 13/15 Checking commit 8971626e3e69 (s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly) 14/15 Checking commit 3017941d6e2c (docs: Add protvirt docs) WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #22: new file mode 100644 total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 60 lines checked Patch 14/15 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. 15/15 Checking commit 509111178918 (s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1) === OUTPUT END === Test command exited with code: 1 The full log is available at http://patchew.org/logs/20200311132151.172389-1-fran...@linux.ibm.com/testing.checkpatch/?type=message. --- Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/]. Please send your feedback to patchew-de...@redhat.com