On 3/25/20 3:10 PM, Oksana Voshchana wrote:
Thanks for the review
I have some comments
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:30 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<phi...@redhat.com <mailto:phi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
this is v3. Please increment the version in the patch subject.
You could also send a simple "ping" to the specific patch, instead of
On 3/25/20 12:31 PM, Oksana Vohchana wrote:
> The exec migration test isn't run a whole test scenario.
> This patch fixes it
> Signed-off-by: Oksana Vohchana <ovosh...@redhat.com
v1 of this patch has already received reviewers tags
please collect them and keep them when you resend the same patch:
I have reposted patch without this fix because this change isn't related
to the series:
Is it make sense to keep this fix as a separate patch?
As we are in freeze and this is a fix, it is fine to reply to your own
"Ping? As this is a fix, can we get this single patch merged for 5.0
You are responsible of tracking your own patches and ping them (every
week) if they are ignored.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com
Tested-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <waine...@redhat.com
> tests/acceptance/migration.py | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> index a8367ca023..0365289cda 100644
> --- a/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> +++ b/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ class Migration(Test):
> @skipUnless(find_command('nc', default=False), "'nc'
command not found")
> def test_migration_with_exec(self):
> - """
> - The test works for both netcat-traditional and
> - """
> + """The test works for both netcat-traditional and
Btw why are you changing the comment style?
I got failure in PEP257
> free_port = self._get_free_port()
> dest_uri = 'exec:nc -l localhost %u' % free_port
> + src_uri = 'exec:nc localhost %u' % free_port
> + self.do_migrate(dest_uri, src_uri)
Alex, if there is no Python testing pullreq, can you take this patch
your testing tree?