On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 07:44:46PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/25/20 1:29 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > We currently run a CI job on macOS Mojave with Xcode 10.
> > >
> > > QEMU policy is to support the two last major OS releases.
> > > Add a job building on macOS Catalina, which comes with Xcode 11.
> > >
> > > Split the target list in two, as we don't need to cover twice the
> > > same targets.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > .travis.yml | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> > > index a2a7fd0dd1..d02a477623 100644
> > > --- a/.travis.yml
> > > +++ b/.travis.yml
> > > @@ -269,9 +269,10 @@ matrix:
> > > # MacOSX builds - cirrus.yml also tests some MacOS builds including
> > > latest Xcode
> > > + # On macOS Mojave, the SDK comes bundled with Xcode 10.
> > > - name: "OSX Xcode 10.3"
> > > env:
> > > - -
> > > CONFIG="--target-list=i386-softmmu,ppc-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,m68k-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu
> > > --extra-cflags=-I/usr/local/opt/ncurses/include
> > > --extra-ldflags=-L/usr/local/opt/ncurses/lib"
> > > + -
> > > CONFIG="--target-list=i386-softmmu,ppc-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,m68k-softmmu
> > > --extra-cflags=-I/usr/local/opt/ncurses/include
> > > --extra-ldflags=-L/usr/local/opt/ncurses/lib"
> > > os: osx
> > > osx_image: xcode10.3
> > > compiler: clang
> > > @@ -301,6 +302,39 @@ matrix:
> > > - ${SRC_DIR}/configure ${BASE_CONFIG} ${CONFIG} || { cat
> > > config.log && exit 1; }
> > > + # On macOS Catalina, the SDK comes bundled with Xcode 11.
> > > + - name: "OSX Xcode 11.3"
> > > + env:
> > > + - CONFIG="--target-list=arm-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu
> > > --extra-cflags=-I/usr/local/opt/ncurses/include
> > > --extra-ldflags=-L/usr/local/opt/ncurses/lib"
> > > + os: osx
> > > + osx_image: xcode11.3
> >
> > Are we duplicating what the latest Xcode on Cirrus is here?
>
> Maybe, I'm not sure. It seems only few people care about Cirrus/Shippable
> but they are not taken seriously by the community, as they are often broken
> and nobody is notified. Currently Travis has a broader audience.
>
> Also I sent a series to fix various things that break on Cirrus from time to
> time but I felt there is not many interest so I stopped spending energy on
> it:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg675074.html
>
> We could change that by refusing to merge pullreq that break such CI.
IMHO less is more. IOW, we should use/support the fewest possible CI
systems required to get the coverage we want. If we can get all macOS
coverage on Travis, I'd remove it from Cirrus, or vica-verca. The fewer
places we have to look at the more likely we'll pay attention to it
when it breaks.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
