On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 15:17, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > Hi, > > Laurent reported hitting the assert in access_el3_aa32ns() > when accessing 32-bit versions of some of the virtualization > regs when EL3 is 64-bit. > > I think we got this wrong back then and it seems to me like > we should merge access_el3_aa32ns and access_el3_aa32ns_aa64_any() > and always call the merged function to handle both aa32-only cases > and mixed aa32/aa64.
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
