пон, 18. мај 2020. у 21:42 Aleksandar Markovic
<aleksandar.qemu.de...@gmail.com> је написао/ла:
>
> From: Jafar Abdi <cafer.a...@gmail.com>
>
This patch was selected by mistake to be included in this series. A ne
version of this series will be sent without this patch.
Sorry about this.
Aleksnadar
> Clean up wrong usage of FALSE and TRUE in places that use "bool" from
> stdbool.h.
>
> FALSE and TRUE (with capital letters) are the constants defined by glib for
> being used with the "gboolean" type of glib. But some parts of the code also
> use
> TRUE and FALSE for variables that are declared as "bool" (the type from
> <stdbool.h>).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jafar Abdi <cafer.a...@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
> index 9ce64d4836..1af4bce139 100644
> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> while ((TPM_TIS_IS_VALID_LOCTY(s->active_locty) &&
> locty > s->active_locty) ||
> !TPM_TIS_IS_VALID_LOCTY(s->active_locty)) {
> - bool higher_seize = FALSE;
> + bool higher_seize = false;
>
> /* already a pending SEIZE ? */
> if ((s->loc[locty].access & TPM_TIS_ACCESS_SEIZE)) {
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> /* check for ongoing seize by a higher locality */
> for (l = locty + 1; l < TPM_TIS_NUM_LOCALITIES; l++) {
> if ((s->loc[l].access & TPM_TIS_ACCESS_SEIZE)) {
> - higher_seize = TRUE;
> + higher_seize = true;
> break;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
