vhdx doesn't have .bdrv_co_block_status handler, so DATA|ALLOCATED is
always assumed for it in bdrv_co_block_status().
unallocated_blocks_are_zero is useless (it doesn't affect the only user
of the field: bdrv_co_block_status()), drop it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---
block/vhdx.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c
index fa9e544a5e..645dc4b4f4 100644
--- a/block/vhdx.c
+++ b/block/vhdx.c
@@ -1164,9 +1164,6 @@ static int vhdx_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs,
BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
bdi->cluster_size = s->block_size;
- bdi->unallocated_blocks_are_zero =
- (s->params.data_bits & VHDX_PARAMS_HAS_PARENT) == 0;
-
return 0;
}
--
2.18.0
