On 16/06/2020 14:47, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> > --- > hw/pci-host/grackle.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci-host/grackle.c b/hw/pci-host/grackle.c > index 4b3af0c704..48d11f13ab 100644 > --- a/hw/pci-host/grackle.c > +++ b/hw/pci-host/grackle.c > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void grackle_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, > void *data) > k->realize = grackle_pci_realize; > k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_MOTOROLA; > k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_MOTOROLA_MPC106; > - k->revision = 0x00; > + k->revision = 0x40; > k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST; > /* > * PCI-facing part of the host bridge, not usable without the
It seems the current value is 0x0, but in one of my dumps I see a value of 0x1, and you're suggesting a value of 0x40. Given that there are clearly multiple revisions of the hardware, I'd suggest dropping this for now since it's not clear to me yet exactly which real hardware is being targetted and what side-effect this might have. ATB, Mark.
