On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 04:16:50PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 7/13/20 3:57 PM, John Snow wrote: > > On 7/11/20 12:15 PM, Robert Foley wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Thanks for the detailed feedback! I will look at making these changes. > >> > > > > Sorry that it came so late ... > > I was looking for the patch that makes the python-next series rebase > to fail and now I see your comments :( > > So we lost the race. I'll see what can still be merged. > > Sorry it took so long due to the Avocado tests failing :( > > OTOH I think it is time to declare the Python scripts need more > maintainers because we can't keep up. There are various scripts > and tests written in Python that missed the 5.1 freeze. > > Cleber/Eduardo what do you think (about getting more maintainers > involved)?
I agree. I am not being able to keep up and dedicate the time required to be a good maintainer for the parts I maintain. My suggestion would be to not have maintainers for "Python scripts" in general, but having actual maintainers for specific parts (python/*, tests/vm, tests/migration, scripts/tracetool, scripts/qapi, etc). -- Eduardo
