On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:44:36AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Features unavailable due to absent of their dependent features should
> not be added to env->user_features. env->user_features only contains the
> feature explicity specified with -feature/+feature by user.
> 
> Fixes: 99e24dbdaa68 ("target/i386: introduce generic feature dependency 
> mechanism")
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com>

Paolo, do you remember why that line existed?  It doesn't make
sense to me.

There are exactly 2 lines of code reading user_features, and both
of them are inside x86_cpu_expand_features() above this hunk.

Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>

> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 9812d5747f35..fb1de1bd6165 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -6370,7 +6370,6 @@ static void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error 
> **errp)
>                                        unavailable_features & 
> env->user_features[d->to.index],
>                                        "This feature depends on other 
> features that were not requested");
>  
> -            env->user_features[d->to.index] |= unavailable_features;
>              env->features[d->to.index] &= ~unavailable_features;
>          }
>      }
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 

-- 
Eduardo


Reply via email to