On 07/31/2011 09:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> I haven't. How does "unconditionally dirty the remapped slot" sound?
>
> I think it isn't introduced by this patchset, yes?
The patch removes the explicit sync from the cirrus code. But the
underlying issue is older of course.
Ah. So I'll detect that condition in memory.c; we get that bug fixed
for all potential callers. I'll leave the race condition until later,
since it wasn't introduced by this patchset.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
