Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll > simplify the rST generator's job. > > PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm not sure it > does. Peter, you tell me :)
I dropped the ball on this one. I think both patches make sense, but I don't want to upset Peter's "Convert QAPI doc comments to generate rST instead of texinfo" apple cart. Peter, please tell me what you'd like me to do: * Post a pull request, so you can base your v6 on it. * Nothing, so you can cherry-pick zero, one or both of my patches into your v6.
